SCEMBLIX®▼ (asciminib) Prescribing information (external link)

GLIVEC® (imatinib mesilate) Prescribing information (external link)

Image
Hero banner. SCEMBLIX®▼ (asciminib) logo.
Image
Hero banner. SCEMBLIX®▼ (asciminib) logo.

SCEMBLIX®▼ (asciminib) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia (Ph+ CML) in chronic phase (CP), previously treated with two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and without a known T315I mutation.1


SCEMBLIX®▼(asciminib) mechanism of action (MoA)

Image
Icon of a shield with a plus symbol inside it.

SCEMBLIX® (asciminib) is the first and only STAMP inhibitor2,3

 

 

Learn how the unique MoA of SCEMBLIX supports its specificity in treating CML.2

Find out more about the efficacy of SCEMBLIX in ASCEMBL

SCEMBLIX® (asciminib) MoA

 

SCEMBLIX targets a different site on BCR-ABL1 compared to TKIs – the myristoyl pocket2–4

 

In people who do not have CML, the myristoyl pocket is occupied by the N-terminal portion of ABL1, maintaining the protein in an inactive conformation. In BCR-ABL1, the myristoyl pocket is vacant, activating the kinase.5,6

SCEMBLIX is a first-in-class STAMP inhibitor. Binding specifically to the myristoyl pocket, it potently inactivates BCR-ABL1 via allosteric inhibition.2

Image
Scemblix mechanism of action diagram.

Click on the video below to find out more.

Scemblix MOA video VIDEO

Why choose a different MoA?

 

Back-to-back use of a second generation TKI may provide limited benefit in patients with CP-CML who are resistant/intolerant to prior second generation TKI treatments8

 

A second generation TKI may have limited benefit in the 3L setting, after the failure of another second generation TKI and first generation TKI prior to that.9

  • In patients with CML, the 8-year overall survival (OS) was 22% (n=13) for those on ≥3L of treatment compared to 83% (n=55) for the patients maintained on imatinib as their 1L therapy*10

    Retrospective cohort analysis from a single centre (MD Anderson)11

     

    Objective

    Assessing responses and long‑term outcomes of using a second‑generation TKI (nilotinib or dasatinib) as 3L therapy after failure of imatinib plus one prior second‑generation TKI

    Population

    Total patients with CML treated sequentially with 3 different TKIs: N=48

    • 3L dasatinib: n=34 (after imatinib + nilotinib)

    • 3L nilotinib:  n=14 (after imatinib + dasatinib)

    Disease phase at start of third TKI:

    • CP patients at 3L: n=25 (52%)

    • 3L dasatinib: n=16 (after imatinib + nilotinib) 

    • 3L nilotinib: n=9 (after imatinib + dasatinib) 

    • Accelerated phase (AP): n=10 (21%)

    • Blast phase: n=13 (27%)

    Starting dose

    Dasatinib:

    • BID: 70 mg (n=15), 50 mg (n=5), 120 mg (n=1)

    • QD: 140 mg (n=9), 100 mg (n=3), 50 mg (n=1)

    Nilotinib:

    • BID: 400 mg (n=11)

    • QD: 800 mg (n=2), 400 mg (n=1)

    Doses could be adjusted for toxicity as per institutional practice

    Endpoints

    Cumulative response (each response grade)
    Event-free survival (EFS), failure-free survival (FFS), OS

    Median follow up from start of third TKI (total cohort)

    13 months

    Response in 3L

    Patient receiving nilotinib in 3L (n=9):

    • Complete cytogenic response (CCyR): 11%

    • Major molecular response (MMR): 33%

    Patients receiving dasatinib in 3L (n=16):

    • CCyR: 31%

    • MMR: 13%

    Retrospective/prospective cohort analysis (single center, Imperial College London)12

     

    Objective

    Assess efficacy of a 3L TKI (dasatinib or nilotinib) in CML patients still in first CP who had failed imatinib + one second‑generation TKI

    • Identify prognostic factors for response and outcomes on 3L therapy

    Population

    Total patients: N=26

    • All in CP and had prior imatinib, followed by 2L dasatinib (n=20) or nilotinib (n=6)

    • 3L drugs: dasatinib or nilotinib (switched from the other second‑generation TKI)

    Starting dose

    ‘Standard doses as described by others’ (i.e., typical CML–CP doses used in prior dasatinib/nilotinib trials)

    Endpoints

    Major cytogenetic response (MCyR), CCyR, MMR

    • Time‑to‑event outcomes: OS, progression‑free survival (PFS) and EFS – definitions as in prior Imperial College CML work (EFS events included progression, loss of response, or death)

    For response analyses, patients who underwent allogeneic SCT (n=6) were censored at transplant for cytogenetic endpoints but not for EFS/PFS/OS

    Median follow up from start of third TKI (total cohort)

    21.5 months

    Response in 3L

    Responses on 3L TKI (any time) (n=26):

    • MCyR: n=13 (50.0%)

    • CCyR: n=9 (34.6%)

    • MMR: n=5 (19.2%)

    International, single‑arm, Phase II trial13

     

    Population

    Adults with Ph+ CML in:

    • CP: n=39

    • AP: n=21

    All had:

    • Prior imatinib resistance or intolerance, and

    • Failure of dasatinib therapy (resistance or intolerance)

    Starting dose

    Nilotinib:

    • 400 mg orally BID (on an empty stomach)

    • Dose escalation: Allowed up to 600 mg BID – used in 9 patients (7 CP, 2 AP)

    Endpoints

    MCyR, CCyR, MMR

    • MCyR = complete (CCyR, 0% Ph+) + partial (PCyR, <35% Ph+ metaphases)

    Median follow up from start of third TKI (total cohort)

    CP: 11 months

    Response in 3L

    CP (n=37):

    • MCyR: n=16 (43%)

    • CCyR: n=9 (24%)

Rates of CCyR for sequential second generation TKI use across different studies

In the absence of head-to-head studies, no comparisons can be made due to varying study designs, low population sizes and diverse patient demographics. However, following the review of the evidence, these studies are suggestive of low observed CCyR rates for sequential second generation TKI use.

Image
Bar chart showing rates of CCyR for sequential second generation TKI use across different studies. Response rates vary from 11% to 32% with sequential second generation TKI use.8,11-13

With its unique MoA, SCEMBLIX offers a different approach for treating CML5–7

 

SCEMBLIX demonstrated superior efficacy vs bosutinib; MMR at week 24, 25.5% vs 13.2%, p=0.029, and was observed to demonstrate a more generally tolerable safety profile2

The most common adverse events of any grade (incidence ≥20%) in patients receiving SCEMBLIX were musculoskeletal pain (38.8%), upper respiratory tract infections (29.5%), fatigue (28.9%), thrombocytopenia (28.1%), headache (26.4%), arthralgia (24.4%), increased pancreatic enzymes (23%), diarrhoea (22.5%), abdominal pain (22.2%), rash (21.6%), hypertension (20.8%) and nausea (20.8%). Please see the Summary of Product Characteristics for further information.


*Data from a retrospective, single centre analysis of patients with CML who received one or more lines of ATP-competitive TKIs.10

1L, first-line; 2L, second-line; 3L, third-line; AP, accelerated phase; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; BCR-ABL1, breakpoint cluster Abelson region murine leukaemia viral oncogene homolog 1; BID, twice daily; CCyR, complete cytogenic response; CML, chronic myeloid leukaemia; CP, chronic phase; EFS, event-free survival; MCyR, major cytogenetic response; MMR, major molecular response; MoA, mechanism of action; OS, overall survival; PCyR, partial cytogenetic response; Ph+ CML, Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia; PFS, progression-free survival; QD, once daily; SCT, stem cell transplantation; STAMP, specifically targeting the ABL1 myristoyl pocket; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

References:

  1. SCEMBLIX (asciminib) Summary of Product Characteristics.

  2. Réa D, et al. Blood 2021;138(21):2031–2041.

  3. Schoepfer J, et al. J Med Chem 2018;61(18):8120–8135.

  4. Redaelli S, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(3):469–471.

  5. Hughes TP, et al. N Engl J Med 2019;381(24):2315–2326.

  6. Manley PW, et al. Leuk Res 2020;98:106458.

  7. Iacob RE, et al. PLoS One 2011;6(1):e15929.

  8. Lipton JH, et al. Leuk Res 2015;39:58–64.

  9. Cortes JE, et al. J Hematol Oncol 2021;14:110.

  10. Bosi GR, et al. HematolTransfus Cell Ther 2019;41:222–228.

  11. Garg RJ, et al. Blood 2009;114:4361–4368.

  12. Ibrahim AR, et al. Blood 2010;116:5497–5500.

  13. Giles F J, et al. Leukemia 2010;24:1299–1301.


UK | February 2026 | FA-11555296-1

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard. Adverse events should also be reported to Novartis online through the pharmacovigilance intake (PVI) tool at www.novartis.com/report, or alternatively email [email protected] or call 01276 698370.