ENTRESTO UK real-world evidence

 

ENTRESTO is indicated in adult patients for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.1

For full safety information, please refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics.1
Please see the below examples of ENTRESTO use in the real-world setting.

Please see the SmPC for further information and initial and following dose adjustments depending on certain conditions.

 


1. South of England – Retrospective comparison of 552 patients over 2 years2

 

This study was published in Heart, an international peer-reviewed journal from BMJ and BCS publishing. No conflicts of interest were reported.

Objective of the study

 

Investigate the extent to which the real-world use of ENTRESTO mirrors that of the PARADIGM-HF population and complies with guideline recommendations.

Overview

Study

Background

Objective

Findings

Real-world use of ENTRESTO in the South of England

  • Retrospective comparison of 552 patients started on ENTRESTO between 2017 and 2019 at 4 centres in the South of England versus those from the ENTRESTO arm of the PARADIGM-HF study.
  • In the final analysis, n=438 patients were included.

Design: Retrospective comparison of n=552 patients started on ENTRESTO between 2017 and 2019 at 4 centres in the South of England with those from the ENTRESTO arm of the PARADIGM-HF study. In the final analysis, n=438 patients were included.

Investigate the extent to which the real-world use of ENTRESTO mirrors that of the PARADIGM-HF population and complies with guideline recommendations.

  • Cardiologists from 4 centres in the South of England prescribed ENTRESTO in a wide range of HF patients.
  • Baseline characteristics in the South of England population treated with ENTRESTO were broadly similar to the PARADIGM-HF study.

Key findings

Cardiologists from the 4 South of England centres studied have prescribed ENTRESTO in a wide range of eligible HF patients in line with the licensed indication.

Image
Key findings bar graph from the South of England study comparing the percentage of patients prescribed ENTRESTO in the clinic cohort versus the PARADIGM-HF cohort divided by NYHA class.

Adapted from Di Marco A, et al. 2020.2

 

Baseline characteristics of the South of England population

Baseline characteristics2

 

PARADIGM-HF cohort N=4187

Clinic patients N=438

p value

Age (years)

63.8 ± 11.5

68.7 ± 12

<0.001

Female sex

879 (21.0)

71 (20.3)

0.01

SBP mmHg

122 ± 15

123 ± 20

0.18

Heart rate – bpm

72 ± 12

69 ± 12

<0.001

Creatinine – mg/dl

1.13 ± 0.3

1.13 ± 0.3

1.0

Clinical features

Ischaemic cardiomyopathy

2506 (59.9)

219 (50.0)

<0.001

LVEF – %

29.6 ± 6.1

29.9 ± 4.8

0.69

Medical history

Hypertension

2969 (70.9)

156 (35.6)

<0.001

Diabetes

1451 (34.7)

112 (25.6)

<0.001

Numbers are total (%) or mean ± standard deviation

92.5% of clinic patients had no exclusion criteria

  • 4 had an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline*

  • 30 had an SBP <100 mmHg†

74% of clinic patients fulfilled inclusion criteria

  • 68 were NYHA class I; 47 had an LVEF ≥35%

*ENTRESTO is not recommended in patients with end-stage renal disease, and concomitant use with aliskiren‐containing medicinal products in patients with diabetes mellitus or in patients with renal impairment (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) is contraindicated. Use with caution in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). (See section 5.1 of the Summary of Product Characteristics). Starting dose of 24 mg/26 mg twice daily and slow dose titration (doubling every 3–4 weeks) are recommended in these patients1

Treatment should not be initiated unless SBP is ≥100 mmHg. Patients with SBP <100 mmHg were not studied.1

Outcomes

 

PARADIGM-HF cohort N=4187

Clinic patients N=438

p value

ENTRESTO discontinued

746 (17.8)

61 (13.9)

0.04

Dose of ENTRESTO at last assessment

375 ± 71 mg

297 ± 120*

<0.001

Decline in renal function (50% or more in eGFR)‡

94 (2.2)

18 (6.5)†

<0.001

New offset AF

84 (2.0)

7 (1.6)

0.55

Elevated serum creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dl

139 (3.3)

12 (2.7)

0.51

Elevated serum creatinine ≥3.0 mg/dl

63 (1.5)

12 (2.7)

0.05

New onset cough

474 (11.3)

10 (2.3)

<0.001

Angiodema

19 (0.4)

2 (0.5)

0.99

Symptomatic hypotension with SBP <90§

112 (2.7)

7 (1.6)

0.13

Numbers are total (%) or mean ± standard deviation

*Excludes patients where ENTRESTO was stopped.



275 results only.



Use of sacubitril/valsartan may be associated with decreased renal function. The risk may be further increased by dehydration or concomitant use of NSAIDs. Down-titration should be considered in patients who develop a clinically significant decrease in renal function.1



§If hypotension occurs during treatment, temporary down-titration or discontinuation of sacubitril/valsartan is recommended.1

 

Conclusions
Baseline characteristics of the clinic population were broadly similar to those treated in the PARADIGM-HF study; ENTRESTO was prescribed in a wide range of HF patients and in some aspects was better tolerated than the trial data suggested.

2. Northern Ireland – NYHA class post-treatment with ENTRESTO6

 

Novartis sponsored Br J Cardiol 2019;26(suppl 1): peer-reviewed journal. The sponsored supplement was initiated and funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd. Editorial control was retained by the authors and editors but Novartis reviewed the supplement for technical accuracy and compliance with relevant regulatory requirements before publication.

Objective of the study

 

Review of how ENTRESTO has been initiated by HF nurse specialists in Northern Ireland, the management of its side effects and its effect on patient outcomes.

 

Overview

Study

Background

Objective

Findings

Real-world experience and clinical data with ENTRESTO: a Northern Ireland perspective:
  • 463 patients with HFrEF initiated with ENTRESTO following ACEi or ARB.

The Southern Health and Social Care Trust in Northern Ireland has a nurse-led HF service, with 7 HF nurse specialists serving approximately 1500 patients. HF patients can be reviewed in either a domiciliary, clinic or acute setting, with nurses supported by consultant cardiologists, renal consultants, GPs and a cardiology pharmacist. The nurses also have access to cardiac investigations. HF nurse specialists in the Trust began to initiate patients on ENTRESTO in September 2016 following publication of the NICE guidance.

To review how ENTRESTO has been initiated by HF nurse specialists in Northern Ireland, the management of its side effects and its effect on patient outcomes.

  • NYHA class improved for patients on ENTRESTO (mainly from class 
III to II).
  • Approximately 7% (n=31/463) patients discontinued ENTRESTO mainly due to decline in renal function, symptomatic hypotension, or diarrhoea.

Key findings

Prescribing ENTRESTO

 

  • Patients were prescribed ENTRESTO if they met the following criteria from the NICE guidance:
    - NYHA class II or above
    - LVEF ≤35%
    - Already established on an ACEi or ARB

  • No extra clinics were run, and no additional resources were allocated

  • The majority of patients were initiated on ENTRESTO at the nurse-led HF clinics

  • Prior to initiation, patients underwent a full clinical assessment by the HF nurse specialists, including medication history and review of renal and hepatic function


Experience with ENTRESTO
 

- 463 patients have been initiated on ENTRESTO in the Southern Health and Social Care Trust

- 31 patients (7%) discontinued ENTRESTO, mostly due to significant decline in renal function, symptomatic hypotension, or diarrhoea

- Careful assessment of volume status and diuretic dose pre-initiation is essential

- Regular contact with the HF nurse specialists, supported by other HCPs, often helped to avoid the need for withdrawal of therapy

- NYHA class improved in patients treated with ENTRESTO, most obviously in patients who have moved from NYHA class III to class II

- For some patients, this has meant that they no longer require referral for cardiac resynchronisation therapy

- One patient was removed from the transplant list

 

“We hope we have demonstrated that [ENTRESTO] can be appropriately initiated, titrated and managed in this [HF nurse specialist] setting.”
 

Donnelly E and Patton C,

 
20194

3. West Midlands – Retrospective multicentre study of 118 symptomatic chronic HFrEF patients in three UK hospital trusts4

 

This study was published in the Journal of Prescribing Practice, after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. No conflicts of interest were reported.

Objective of the study

 

A retrospective multicentre study to explore real-life patient data regarding prescribing of ENTRESTO for symptomatic chronic HF patients in three hospitals, in accordance with national guidelines.

Overview

Study

Background

Objective

Findings

To explore prescribing practices of ENTRESTO at three UK hospitals over a 6-month period in accordance with national NICE guidelines.

Design: A multicentre retrospective study was conducted over a 6-month period of the use on ENTRESTO. The study proforma was adapted from NICE 2016 guidelines. Patient information collected: NYHA functional class, LVEF, and prior HF medication. Data on ENTRESTO treatment were gathered, including side effects, re-admission, discontinuation, and patient demographic data. In addition, blood pressure data, heart rate, eGFR, potassium and sodium levels were collected, as well as patients’ baseline medication (beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid antagonists, diuretics) and devices (implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) and pacemakers (PPM)).

  • To determine adherence to NICE guideline TA388 2016 when prescribing ENTRESTO therapy.
  • To compare prescribing rates of ENTRESTO at three hospitals to the predicted prescribing rates calculated when using the NICE resource tool.
  • To explore differences and variations between the hospitals regarding their prescribing of ENTRESTO.
  • To describe the characteristics of patients prescribed ENTRESTO.
  • 93% of prescribers adhered to the 3 main NICE criteria for ENTRESTO prescribing:
    - NYHA class II or above.
    - LVEF ≤35%.
    - Already established on an ACEi or ARB.
  • Substantially fewer patients were prescribed ENTRESTO than predicted by the NICE resource tool.
  • Time to initiation and number of patients prescribed ENTRESTO varied across Trusts.
  • Hypotension, fatigue and decline in renal function were the main side effects identified among the patient population included in this study.

Key findings

  • Please see the SmPC for further information and initial and following dose adjustments depending on certain conditions
  • NICE guidelines recommend ENTRESTO as an option for treating symptomatic chronic HFrEF, only in people: with NYHA class II to IV symptoms and; with a LVEF ≤35%; who are already taking a stable dose of ACEi or ARBs. Treatment with sacubitril/valsartan should be started by a heart failure specialist with access to a multidisciplinary heart failure team. Dose titration and monitoring should be performed by the most appropriate team member as defined in the NICE guideline on chronic heart failure in adults: diagnosis and management.8

 

Adherence to NICE guidance* was high across the 3 hospital cohorts studied

Image
Bar graph showing that the adherence to NICE guidance of patients prescribed ENTRESTO was high across 3 hospital cohorts studied.

Substantially fewer patients were prescribed ENTRESTO than predicted by the NICE resource tool

 

Time to initiation and number of patients prescribed ENTRESTO varied across Trusts

Image
Three graphs showing the prescribing uptake onto ENTRESTO in Hospital 1, 2 and 3 in relationship to NICE TA388 publication. Highlighting that there is potential to improve prescribing practices and recruiting of HF patients who meet the criteria for ENTRESTO.

Adapted from Jalal Z, et al. 2019.4

Image
Three graphs showing the prescribing uptake onto ENTRESTO in Hospital 1, 2 and 3 in relationship to NICE TA388 publication. Highlighting that there is potential to improve prescribing practices and recruiting of HF patients who meet the criteria for ENTRESTO.

Adapted from Jalal Z, et al. 2019.5

Image
Three graphs showing the prescribing uptake onto ENTRESTO in Hospital 1, 2 and 3 in relationship to NICE TA388 publication. Highlighting that there is potential to improve prescribing practices and recruiting of HF patients who meet the criteria for ENTRESTO.

Adapted from Jalal Z, et al. 2019.5

 

ENTRESTO real-world safety profile
 

  • The main side effects of ENTRESTO mentioned in the NICE guideline include hypotension, hyperkalaemia and renal impairment.8 Across all Trusts studied, on average 65% (n=76/118) of patients within this study experienced one of the following side effects: dizziness, hypotension, renal impairment and fatigue5

 

Based on number of patients anticipated to have met the treatment criteria detailed in NICE TA388 each year.


Sample size in this study was small and no clear conclusion could be made due to inconsistency in the documentation of side effects in the 3 hospital databases.

4. University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire – Retrospective evaluation of the clinical use of ENTRESTO in a large cardiovascular centre6

 

Br J Cardiol 2019;26(suppl 1):
Peer-reviewed journal. The sponsored supplement was initiated and funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd. Editorial control was retained by the authors and editors but Novartis reviewed the supplement for technical accuracy and compliance with relevant regulatory requirements before publication.

Objective of the study

 

Evaluation of the clinical use of ENTRESTO in a large cardiovascular care centre, in terms of the morbidity and mortality, tolerability and up-titration to its guideline-mandated target dose (97/103 mg BID) in patients switched from ≥4 weeks' ACEi/ARB therapy.

Overview

Study

Background

Objective

Findings

Early clinical experience with ENTRESTO from a large UK tertiary centre:

  • Retrospective evaluation of 140 patients with HFrEF and previous treatment with ACEi/ARB.
  • Patients were studied from April 2016 to July 2017 in a nurse-led, MDT-backed HF clinic.

Design: A real-world, retrospective evaluation of the effects of ENTRESTO in 140 patients aged ≥18 years with HFrEF (≤35%), NYHA class II–IV, eGFR >30 mL/min/
1.73 m2 and ≥4 weeks’ previous treatment with ACEi/ARB. Patients were studied from April 2016 to July 2017 in a nurse-led, MDT-backed HF clinic.

To evaluate the clinical use of ENTRESTO in a large cardiovascular care centre, in terms of morbidity and mortality, tolerability and up-titration to its guideline-mandated target dose (97/103 mg BID) in patients switched from ≥4 weeks ACEi/ARB therapy.

  • All-cause mortality at 1 year was 7% (N=68)
  • 66% patients had a mean increase in LVEF from 19% to 27% 

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics

Male

108 (77%)

Mean age (range), years

67 (29–89)

Mean LVEF, % (range)

23 (8–35)

NYHA class

II

74 (53%)

III

65 (46%)

IV

1 (1%)

Comorbidities

Ischaemic heart disease

46 (33%)

Atrial fibrillation

53 (38%)

Diabetes mellitus

36 (26%)

Hypertension

49 (35%)

Chronic kidney disease

39 (28%)

Medications

ACEi

103 (73%)

ARB

38 (27%)

Beta blocker

135 (96%)

MRA

96 (69%)

Loop diuretics

104 (74%)

Devices

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy*

22 (16%)

Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator

8 (6%)

*Defibrillator/pacemaker.
Data shown are number (%), except where indicated.

Key findings

Up-titration of ENTRESTO in 140 patients initiated on this treatment

Event*

N(%)

Up-titration achieved to 97/103 mg BD

77 (55%)

Reduction in loop diuretic dosage

30 (27%)

ENTRESTO withdrawn for adverse events

11 (8%)

MRA dose reduced due to hyperkalaemia

2 (2%)

MRA stopped due to hyperkalaemia

1 (1%)

Postural hypotension with drop of SBP >10 mmHg

44 (31%)

*Treatment should not be initiated if the serum potassium level is >5.4 mmol/l or with SBP <100 mmHg. If either hypotension or hyperkalaemia occurs during treatment discontinuation should be considered. Please refer to the ENTRESTO SmPC for full guidance.1

If serum potassium level is >5.4 mmol/l discontinuation should be considered.

 

Up-titration to the target dose was achieved by 55% (n=77/140) patients

 

  • ENTRESTO was not tolerated by 11 (8%) patients, mainly due to symptoms of postural hypotension
    - Mean SBP fell noticeably between the second and third study visits and remained stable thereafter
    - Postural hypotension (SBP reduction >10 mmHg) preventing up-titration to the target dose was observed in 31% (n=44/140) patients at clinic follow-up

 

Deterioration of renal function in a small proportion of patients did not prevent up-titration to target dose for some, as no progressive impairment of renal function*

 

  • eGFR deteriorated by >10 mL/min/1.73 m2 in n=15 (10.7%) patients.
    - Five of the fifteen patients achieved up-titration to the target dose

 

Entresto resulted in low real-world HF mortality

 

The concomitant use of sacubitril/valsartan with ACE inhibitors is contraindicated. Sacubitril/valsartan must not be started until 36 hours after taking the last dose of ACE inhibitor therapy. ACE inhibitor therapy must not be started until 36 hours after the last dose of sacubitril/valsartan

Event*

N(%)

All-cause mortality at 6 months (n=140)

5 (4%)

All-cause mortality at 1 year (n=68) 

5 (7%)

HF admissions at 6 months (n=140)

8 (6%)

HF admissions at 1 year (n=68)

4 (6%)

*Use of ENTRESTO may be associated with decreased renal function. The risk may be further increased by dehydration or concomitant use of NSAIDs. Down-titration should be considered in patients who develop a clinically significant decrease in renal function. ENTRESTO was not recommended in patients with end-stage renal disease, and concomitant use with aliskiren‐containing medicinal products in patients with diabetes mellitus or in patients with renal impairment (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) was contraindicated. Use with caution in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Please refer to the ENTRESTO SmPC for full guidance.1


Two related to HF, three not related to HF.
 

Patients demonstrated improved LVEF and/or change of at least one NYHA class following ENTRESTO treatment
 

  • ENTRESTO treatment resulted in an improvement of at least one NYHA class for 31% (n=43/140) patients

  • 66% of patients (n=23/34 patients who underwent repeat LVEF evaluation post-ENTRESTO treatment) demonstrated improved LVEF with a mean increase from 19% to 27% following ENTRESTO

 

Of 140 patients treated with ENTRESTO, 7 achieved a normal LVEF of ≥55% from a baseline of severe LV systolic impairment (LVEF ≤35%)7

 

5. Cardiff: Cardiac function, symptoms and QoL with ENTRESTO8
 

This study was published in the BMJ Open Heart Journal, and was externally peer reviewed. The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. One of the authors, ZY, has received lecture fees and research funding from Novartis.

Objective of the study

 

Descriptions of the real-world experience of switching stable and optimally medicated patients with HFrEF to ENTRESTO with respect to quality of life and echocardiographic outcomes, and safety.

Overview

Study

Background

Objective

Findings

Real-world treatment switching to sacubitrll/valsartan in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction:

  • of 80 consecutive patients from a Cardiff cohort, switched from ACEi/ARB to ENTRESTO
  • Patients had a diagnosis of stable HFrEF from June 2017 to May 2019

Design: Retrospective cohort study of 80 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of stable HFrEF (defined as symptoms and/or signs of HF, NYHA functional classification of ≥II and a LVEF of ≤35% measured by echocardiography) from June 2017 to May 2019. Patients' clinical assessment, biochemistry, echocardiography and QoL were compared pre-treatment switching and post-treatment switching.

Describe the real-world experience of switching stable and optimally medicated patients with HFrEF to ENTRESTO with respect to quality of life and echocardiographic outcomes, and safety.

  • Resulted in changes in NYHA score, QoL (MLHFQ) and cardiac structure and function in patients with stable HFrEF following a switch from optimal guideline-directed medical therapy. Please see key findings for statistical information
  • No association with significant change in renal function.

*ENTRESTO is not recommended in patients with end-stage renal disease and concomitant use with aliskiren‐containing medicinal products in patients with diabetes mellitus or in patients with renal impairment (eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2) is contraindicated. Use with caution in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2).1

 

Limitations of the study:

Small sample of sequential patients with short follow-up

  • Young age group (mean age of 64) may preclude extrapolation to an older cohort, who are more likely to have more advanced disease with a range of comorbidities, such as decline in renal function or autonomic dysfunction
  • Lack of comparator group in the study. Patients were already treatment optimised prior to sacubitril/valsartan switch so each effectively acted as his or her own control

Key findings

ENTRESTO resulted in changes in blood pressure, NYHA score and QoL (MLHFQ) in patients with stable HFrEF following a switch from ACEi/ARB to ENTRESTO

 

 

n

Pre-switching

Post-
switching

Mean difference (SD)

95% CI

p value

NYHA score

71

2.3

1.9

–0.4 (0.63)

–0.6 to –0.2

<0.001

MLHFQ score

33

46

38

–9 (19)

–15 to –2

0.016

SBP (mmHg)

68

123

112

–10 (14)

–14 to –7

<0.001

DBP (mmHg)

68

72

68

–4 (10)

–6 to –1

0.004

 

Changes in cardic structure and function were observed with ENTRESTO in patients with stable HFrEF following a switch from ACEi/ARB to ENTRESTO

 

 

n

Pre-switching

Post-
switching

Mean difference (SD)

95% CI

p value

LVEF (%)

49

26

33

7 (10)

4 to 10

<0.001

LVESD (cm)

37

5.2

4.9

–0.3 (0.8)

–0.6 to –0.08

0.013

LVEDD (cm)

48

6.0

5.7

–0.3 (0.7)

–0.5 to –0.1

0.042

 

ENTRESTO treatment was not associated with a significant change in renal function in patients with stable HFrEF following a switch from ACEi/ARB to ENTRESTO

 

 

n

Pre-switching

Post-
switching

Mean difference (SD)

95% CI

p value

K+(mmol/L)

71

4.6

4.7

0.1 (0.40)

–0.01 to 0.20

0.054

Creatinine (µmol/L)

71

95

97

2 (14)

–1 to 6

0.17

eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)

71

69

67

–2 (13)

–5 to 1

0.23

 

Entresto should not be co-administered with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). Due to the potential risk of angioedema when used concomitantly with an ACE inhibitor, it must not be started for at least 36 hours after discontinuing ACE inhibitor therapy

Image
Flow diagram showing the study design for the PARADIGM-HF trial.

Adapted from Ganesananthan S, et al. 2020.9

ACEi, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; AF, atrial fibrillation; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; BD, twice daily; BP, blood pressure; bpm, beats per minute; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DGH, district general hospital; EF, ejection fraction; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GP, general practitioner; HCP, healthcare professional; HF, heart failure; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; HFrLVEF, heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction; IV, intravenous; K+, potassium; LV, left ventricular; LVEDD, left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVEF, left-ventricular ejection fraction; LVESD, left ventricular end systolic diameter; MDT, multidisciplinary team; MLHFQ, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NICE, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; NYHA, New York Heart Association; PARADIGM-HF, Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEi to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure; QoL, quality of life; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation.

 

References:
1. ENTRESTO (sacubitril/valsartan) Summary of Product Characteristics.
2. DiMarco A, et al. Heart 2020;106(Suppl. 2):A1–A118.
3. Donnelly E, Patton C. Br J Cardiol 2019;26(Suppl. 1):S22–S24.
4. Jalal Z, et al. J Prescr Pract 2019;1(4):182–192.
5. NICE (2016). Sacubitril valsartan for treating symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. TA388. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta388/resources/sacubitril-valsartan-for-treating-symptomatic-chronic-heart-failure-with-reduced-ejection-fraction-pdf-82602856425157
6. Ali D, et al. Br J Cardiol 2019;26(Suppl. 1):S9–S14.
7. Pugh J, et al. Audit of de novo initiation of ENTRESTO. Work-based learning 7LMS0157-0206-2020.
8. Ganesananthan S, et al. BMJ 2020;7:e001305.

 

UK | September 2025 | FA-11286124

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard. Adverse events should also be reported to Novartis online through the pharmacovigilance intake (PVI) tool at www.novartis.com/report, or alternatively email [email protected] or call 01276 698370.