Image
Hero Banner. Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan) logo.
Image
Hero Banner. Entresto® (sacubitril/valsartan) logo.

 

Entresto (sacubitril/valsartan) efficacy and clinical trials

 

ENTRESTO is indicated in adult patients for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.1

For further information, please refer to the Entresto Summary of Product Characteristics.1

    In your outpatients with HFrEF:
     

    In the largest heart failure (HF) trial ever conducted (N = 8442), Entresto showed superior efficacy in reducing HF hospitalisations or CV death vs ACEi (enalapril).2

     

    Image
    Entresto efficacy graphic detailing the relative risk reduction in CV death or HF hospitalisation from the PARADIGM-HF trial.

    1. PARADIGM-HF PRIMARY ENDPOINT

    PARADIGM-HF demonstrated a lower risk of CV death or HF hospitalisation with ENTRESTO vs ACEi (enalapril).1,2

    Image
    Graph showing time to first occurence of CV death or HF Hospitalisation from the PARADIGM-HF trial.

    Adapted from McMurray et al. 2014.

    Study Design

    PARADIGM-HF was a multinational, randomised, double-blind trial comparing ENTRESTO to enalapril in 8442 symptomatic (NYHA Class II–IV) chronic HFrEF patients (LVEF ≤40%, amended later to ≤35%).2

    Image
    Graphic showing the PARADIGM-HF trial study design.

    Adapted from McMurray et al. 2014.2

    PARADIGM-HF: Sudden cardiac death post hoc analysis

    ENTRESTO was observed to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death (n=561) vs ACEi (enalapril) (35.2% [n = 250] vs 37.2% [n = 311] [HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68–0.94, P = 0.008]).*3

    This study was a secondary analysis and no confirmatory clinical conclusions can be drawn from such an analysis 

    *This secondary analysis investigated the effect of ENTRESTO (n = 4,217) versus ACEi (enalapril) (n = 4,182) on the mode of death in PARADIGM-HF. The overall risk of CV death was reduced by 20% with ENTRESTO treatment (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 – 0.89, P <0.001) in PARADIGM-HF

    In your hospitalised patients:
     

    ENTRESTO showed significantly greater reductions in NT-proBNP vs ACEi (enalapril), when initiated in hospital following haemodynamic stabilisation after an ADHF episode.4

    ENTRESTO is indicated in adult patients for the treatment of symptomatic chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. ENTRESTO is not indicated for the treatment of acute HF.1
    Patients in the PIONEER-HF trial were required to be haemodynamically stabilised from an ADHF episode while in hospital.4

     

    Image
    Primary endpoint graph showing change in NT-proBNP from baseline % by week from randomisation.


    Adapted from Velazquez et al. 2019.4

    Study design

    PIONEER-HF was a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled trial designed to assess, over an 8-week period, the safety, tolerability and efficacy of in-hospital initiation of ENTRESTO compared with enalapril in 881 adult patients in the United States with chronic HFrEF(EF ≤40% and NT-proBNP ≥1600 pg/mL or BNP ≥400 pg/mL) haemodynamically stabilised during hospitalisation for an episode of ADHF.

    Image
    PIONEER-HF study design graphic.

    Adapted from Velazquez et al 20195 and DeVore et al 2019.5

    Regardless of where eligible symptomatic chronic HFrEF patients are in their hospitalisation journey, starting ENTRESTO as early as possible may improve outcomes vs ACEi (enalapril).4-6

    Image
    Graph showing the effect of ENTRESTO vs enalapril on the composite of HF death or HF hospitalisation.

    Adapted from Morrow et al. 2019.6

    Entresto as first choice was observed to keep patients from hospitalisation vs ACEi patients from rehospitalisation longer vs ACEi6

    Image
    img

    Adapted from Morrow et al. 2019.6

    In a secondary Analysis of Pioneer-HF, delaying the initation of Entresto was observed to increase the risk of HF rehospitalisations and CV death.5

    Image
    Graph showing the impact of delaying the initiation of ENTRESTO on HF rehospitalisations and CV death in secondary analysis of PIONEER-HF.

    Adapted from DeVore et al. 2020. 

    These data include HF hospitalisations.

    Patients who started on ENTRESTO at baseline experienced greater reduction in events in CV death or HF rehospitalisation events vs patients started on enalaprill.5,7

    In newly diagnosed patients:

    In a pre-specified subgroup analysis of PIONEER-HF, ENTRESTO as first choice helped reduce cardiac stress and improve outcomes vs ACEi.7

    Image
    Graph showing change in NT-proBNP % from baseline in a pre-specified subgroup analysis of PIONEER-HF.

    Adapted from Ambrosy et al 2020.7

    Patient Characteristics

    Image
    Graph showing cumulative incidence of CV death or HF rehospitalisation.

    Adapted from Ambrosy et al. 2020.7

    A prospective exploratory analysis showed a statistically significant observed correlation between the reduction in NT-proBNP and echocardiographic measures between baseline, 6 months and 12 months (all correlations/r values were < ±0.4 and P < 0.001).‡8

     

    Image
    Graph showing LVEF from baseline to 6 and 12 months (p<0.001).

     

     

    ENTRESTO was associated with increases in LVEF from baseline to 6 and 12 months (P<0.001)

     

    Remodelling parameter

    Mean change from baseline at 6 months
    (95%CI)

    Mean change from baseline at 12 months
    (95%CI)

    LVESVi (mL/m2)

    -8.7
    (-9.18 to -8.15)

    -15.3
    (-16.03 to -14.55)

    LVEDVi (mL/m2)

    -6.7
    (-7.11 to -6.19)

    -12.3
    (-12.92 to -11.58)

    LAVi (mL/m2)

    -4.4
    (-4.73 to -3.99)

    -7.6
    (-7.98 to -7.15)

    E/e’

    -1.2
    (-1.63 to -0.83)

    -1.3
    (-1.74 to -0.86)

     

    In PROVE-HF, over 75% of HF patients were previously on an ACEi/ARB before switching to ENTRESTO 
     

    In a prospective exploratory analysis, ENTRESTO was observed to be associated with reverse  cardiac remodelling measures and improvement in cardiac volume and function from baseline8

    |

    LVEF increase observed in ACEi/ARB-naive patients

    In a 12-month prospective exploratory analysis, in ACEi/ARB-naive patients, there was an observed increase in the ENTRESTO arm in median LVEF to 43.5% from baseline (28.4%)8

    Image
    Chart showing median LVEF % from basline and at 12 months in previously diagnosed patients treated with ACEiARBs and in newly diagnosed and previously diagnosed ACEiARB-naive patients.

    Adapted from Januzzi et al. 20198

    PROVE-HF Study Design

    PROVE-HF was a prospective, Phase IV, 52-week, open-label, single-group exploratory analysis (n=794). The primary endpoint was the correlation between changes in NT-proBNP concentration and cardiac remodelling, assessed by change in LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVEF, and LAVI from baseline to 12 months. Correlation between the change in concentration of NTproBNP and E/e′ was added to the statistical analysis plan prior to database lock.

    Consider prescribing ENTRESTO to act directly on the heart and you could help improve cardiac function for your symptomatic chronic HFrEF patients.8

    What would it mean for your HFrEF patients to feel better during social and physical activities?9-11

     

    Most patients with heart failure report limitations in their daily activities due to physical symptoms such as dyspnoea, fatigue, oedema, sleeping difficulties and chest pain.12

    Image
    Graphic based on a post hoc secondary analysis of PARADIGM-HF showing observed improvements in physical and social activities with ENTRESTO versus ACEi at 8 months from baseline.


     

    In a post hoc analysis of PARADIGM-HF: observed long term responses of ENTRESTO vs ACEi (enalapril) modelled up to 2 years of increased life expectancy11


    Freedom from the composite primary endpoint of CV death or HF hospitalisation after age 55 years:

    Enalapril: 7.4 years vs Entresto: 9.6 years
    Difference: 2.1 years (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3) P<0.001

    Freedom from the composite primary endpoint of CV death or HF hospitalisation after age 65 years:

    Enalapril: 7.6 years vs Entresto: 9.2 years 
    Difference: 1.6 years (95% CI, 0.7 to 2.5) P<0.001

    Based on actuarial estimates from the PARADIGM-HF trial and assuming that protective effects of Entresto remain consistent with long-term use. Extrapolated from available shortterm follow-up data.

     

     

    See the safety profile of Entresto

Please click here for safety information

*This secondary analysis investigated the effect of ENTRESTO (n=4217) versus ACEi (enalapril; n=4182) on the mode of death in PARADIGM-HF. The overall risk of CV death was reduced by 20% with ENTRESTO treatment (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.72–0.89; p<0.001) in PARADIGM-HF.

†Serious clinical outcomes include HF hospitalisation or CV death.

‡PROVE-HF is a phase IV, single-arm, multicentre, open-label trial in the United States, of which 654 (82.4%) patients completed the 52-week study. This open-label study evaluated the effects of ENTRESTO on biomarkers, cardiac remodelling, and patient-reported outcomes in heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The correlation between the change in concentration of NT-proBNP and E/e′ was added to the statistical analysis plan prior to the database lock. The primary endpoint was the correlation of NT-proBNP concentrations with LVEF, LVEDVI, LVESVI and LAVI measures. At 12 months, NTproBNP concentrations were associated with changes in these cardiac measures (all p<0.5). A secondary endpoint was the change in cardiac remodelling with Entresto treatment at 6 and 12 months. 

§In PARADIGM-HF, KCCQ (an HF QoL composite measurement score) was a pre-specified secondary study endpoint. Change in KCCQ clinical summary score at 8 months -2.99±0.36 (ENTRESTO) vs -4.63±0.36 (enalapril); HR 1.64 (0.63-22.65); P=0.001.

||The study did not investigate, nor provide any evidence that sacubitril/valsartan has any direct effect on sexual function, and this finding may be a surrogate
for overall well-being. The PARADIGM-HF trial did not collect erectile dysfunction data, and few patients reported taking erectile dysfunction medication. 

¶LSM estimation (SE) ENTRESTO vs enalapril: 0.80 (SE 0.20) vs -0.39 (SE -0.20). LSM estimates (SE) difference: 1.19 [0.28], P<0.001. Overall score comprising KCCQ measurement differences at pre-determined study KCCQ questionnaire administrations study timepoints of: Months 4, 8,12 ,24 & 36 (from randomisation).


References

  1. ENTRESTO (sacubitril/valsartan) Summary of Product Characteristics.

  2. McMurray JJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2014;371(11):993-1004.

  3. Desai AS, et al. Eur Heart J. 2015:36(30); 1990-1997.

  4. Velazquez EJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2019;380(6):539-548.

  5. DeVore AD, et al. Initiation of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition after acute decompensated heart failure: results of the open-label extension of the PIONEERHF trial. Data presented at American College of Cardiology 68th Annual Scientific Session, March 2019.

  6. Morrow DA, et al. Circulation 2019;139(19):2285-2288.

  7. Ambrosy AP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76(9):1034–1048.

  8. Januzzi JL Jr, et al. JAMA 2019;322(11):1085-1095.

  9. Chandra A, et al. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3(6):498–505.

  10. Lewis EF, et al. Circ Heart Fail 2017;10(8):e003430.

  11. Claggett B, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373(23):2289–2290.

  12. Heo S, et al. Heart Lung 2009;38(2):100–108.

 

UK | January 2026 | FA-11291491-1

 

Adverse events should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard. Adverse events should also be reported to Novartis online through the pharmacovigilance intake (PVI) tool at www.novartis.com/report, or alternatively email [email protected] or call 01276 698370.