Despite treatment progress, intolerance can prevent patients from meeting their goals1
Improving/preserving QOL
Treatment-related AEs can lead to:
Treatment discontinuation2
Reduced dosing1
Nonadherence3
Switching therapies2
*For a number of reasons (including SEs), it is possible that QOL may decline at any point along the disease/treatment trajectory. Also, it is likely that the QOL decline might not be as steady as shown in this figure (the trend of the QOL curve reported here is for descriptive purposes only.
†One goal of first-line TKI therapy should be to ensure optimal QoL for as long as possible. Any effort should be made to maintain an “acceptable” QoL level for each patient (ie, before reaching the critical threshold below which the risk of poor adherence behavior is heightened).
In patients newly diagnosed with CML-CP, TFR is a rapidly emerging treatment goal
40% to 50% of patients are eligible to attempt TFR4
and 50% to 60% of patients treated with 2G TKIs can sustain TFR4
Criteria for TKI Discontinuation: according to NCCN CML 20265
- CP-CML. No prior history of AP-CML or BP-CML.
- On approved TKI therapy for at least 3 years.a,b
- Prior evidence of quantifiable BCR::ABL1 transcript.
- Stable molecular response (MR4; BCR::ABL1 ≤0.01% IS) for ≥2 years, as documented on at least 4 tests, performed at least 3 months apart.b
- Access to a reliable qPCR test with a sensitivity of detection of at least MR4.5 (BCR::ABL1 ≤0.0032% IS) and that provides results within 2 weeks.
- Molecular monitoring every 1–2 months for the first 6 months following discontinuation, bimonthly during months 7–12, and quarterly thereafter (indefinitely) for patients who remain in MMR (MR3; BCR::ABL1 ≤0.1% IS).
- Prompt resumption of TKI within 4 weeks of a loss of MMR with monthly molecular monitoring until MMR is re-established, then every 3 months thereafter is recommended indefinitely for patients who have reinitiated TKI therapy after a loss of MMR. If MMR is not achieved after 3 months of TKI resumption, BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutation testing should be performed, and monthly molecular monitoring should be continued for another 6 months.
a The feasibility of TFR following discontinuation of TKIs other than dasatinib, imatinib, or nilotinib has not yet been evaluated in clinical studies. It is reasonable to assume that the likelihood of TFR following discontinuation would be similar irrespective of TKI in patients who have achieved and maintained DMR (MR4.0; ≤0.01% BCR::ABL1 IS) for ≥2 years, based on the extrapolation of findings from the studies that have evaluated TFR following discontinuation of imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib.
b Disease characteristics at diagnosis, blast cell and platelet count in peripheral blood, a higher Sokal risk score, female gender, lower natural killer (NK) cell counts, suboptimal response or resistance to imatinib, duration of TKI therapy and DMR prior to TKI discontinuation have been identified as independent factors predictive of recurrence after TKI discontinuation. In the EURO-SKI study, only the duration of TKI therapy prior to discontinuation was significantly associated with the maintenance of MMR at 36 months after TKI discontinuation (Mahon FX, et al. J Clin Oncol 2024;42:1875-1880). Lack of MR4.0 at 36 months after discontinuation of TKI was highly predictive of subsequent loss of MMR (Richter J, et al. Leukemia 2021;35:2416-2418).
Adapted from ref 5 and 6
Adherence is important for achieving responses such as MMR and CMR, which are essential for disease control and TFR eligibility7
ABL1, Abelson protein tyrosine kinase 1; AE, adverse event; BCR, breakpoint cluster region; BP, blast phase; DMR, deep molecular response; IS, International Scale; MMR, major molecular response; MR, molecular response; QOL, quality of life; TFR, treatment-free remission; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
References
Hochhaus A, Saussele S, Rosti G, Mahon FX, Janssen JJ, Hjorth-Hansen H, Richter J, Buske C. Chronic myeloid leukaemia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology. 2017 Jul 1;28:iv41-51.
Hehlmann R, Cortes JE, Zyczynski T, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Goldberg SL, Mauro MJ, Michallet M, Simonsson B, Williams LA, Gajavelli S, DeGutis I. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor interruptions, discontinuations and switching in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia in routine clinical practice: SIMPLICITY. American journal of hematology. 2019 Jan;94(1):46-54.
Efficace F, Cannella L. The value of quality of life assessment in chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Hematology 2014, the American Society of Hematology Education Program Book. 2016 Dec 2;2016(1):170-9.
Garcia-Horton A, Lipton JH. Treatment outcomes in chronic myeloid leukemia: does one size fit all?. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2020 Oct 1;18(10):1421-8.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®), NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2026 Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cml.pdf . Last accessed 10/9/2025
Apperley JF, Milojkovic D, Cross NC, Hjorth-Hansen H, Hochhaus A, Kantarjian H, Lipton JH, Malhotra H, Niederwieser D, Radich J, Rousselot P. 2025 European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA. Leukemia. 2025 Jul 11:1-7.
Marin D, Bazeos A, Mahon FX, Eliasson L, Milojkovic D, Bua M, Apperley JF, Szydlo R, Desai R, Kozlowski K, Paliompeis C. Adherence is the critical factor for achieving molecular responses in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who achieve complete cytogenetic responses on imatinib. Journal of clinical oncology. 2010 May 10;28(14):2381-8.
Approved by Egyptian Drug Authority: HF0424OA5944/042026. Invalidation date: 20/04/2028
Kindly report any violated online promotional, educational and awareness material not having this message to The General administration for Regulation of Marketing & Advertising Materials at: www.edaegypt.gov.eg
Image
HF0424OA5944/042026 20/04/2028 |